Monday, May 30, 2005

Soccer - 2nd LA classico is in books

2nd LA Classico is in the books
By
Nate Wunderman

What a difference several weeks makes and not. Several weeks ago, the Los Angeles Galaxy “hosted” CD Chivas USA in the first ever edition of the LA derby and beat the goats 3-1. This time around, even though Chivas were now the “hosts,” the score was 2-0 in the Galaxy’s favor. What is different is that with this current MLS season one-third of the way through, the respective teams’ fate has come into clearer focus. The fate of the Galaxy appears as if they will be fighting FC Dallas for the Western Conference crown. As for Chivas USA, unless they hit a vein of adequate form, will have the ignominious “distinction” of surpassing the 1999 Metrostar’s pathetic record of 7-25.
Going into the match, the Galaxy had the appearance of a team who could be had. Injuries and national team call-ups have decimated the men in green and gold. Seeing starting first team action for the first time this season was Costa Rican defender Pablo Chinchilla. Chinchilla would make a good case for more playing time during the classico. Unlike the prior season, so far the Galaxy bench has shown itself capable. In fact, the Galaxy has shown a knack for getting results despite less-than-adequate performances on the pitch. This knack was conspicuously absent last season.
Unfortunately for the goats, the “mandated” move of replacing rookie goalkeeper Brad Guzan with veteran Martin Zuniga has actually “helped” the Chivas USA defense regress. This is somewhat understandable given that the respective keepers are completely different and thus the defenders in front of them have to adjust their play accordingly. Guzan is tall and physically dominant, plus his defenders had begun to show signs of familiarity with their net-minder. Zuniga is average-sized and relies upon quickness and experience. His defenders relative unfamiliarity with resulted in five goal shelling at the feet of FC Dallas. It should be mentioned that both keepers cannot rescue their team every time their defenders lose their concentration (which they do too often to tread water in MLS).
What is starting to become apparent is that the Chivas powers-that-be underestimated badly the level of play in MLS and how much physical play American referees allow. Another factor adding to their misery is how motivated the other MLS teams are to “put Chivas USA in their place,” especially considering the mouthing off Vegara and Co. did predicting almost instant success merely by having their “farm team” show up. Judging the comments emanating from the Chivas USA executive quarter, they have begun to realize that. Another item of concern is the anemic attendance that ESPN analyst Eric Wynalda predicted would happen if the team got out to a poor start. That has come to pass and does not appear to be getting any better as long as the product on the pitch continues to stink it up. Expect some front office shake-ups if the attendance woes continue.
Meanwhile outside the world of American soccer: the bold words about soccer becoming the second sport on the American team sports totem pole may actually come to pass due to the actions of the sports immediately above it. The NHL continues to stab itself in the foot, as their labor problems show no sign of being resolved anytime soon. The NBA is also starting to slide down the slippery slope of labor trouble. A prudent course for soccer would be to try to knock off one opponent at a time. A chance for a great leap forward might emerge next year though. If both the NHL & NBA were out of commission, sports media outlets such as ESPN would almost be forced to cover soccer simply due to the need to fill time. Especially when all that’s going on is baseball and World Cup 2006.

Tuesday, May 24, 2005

Time to write about soccer on this blog

As some of you may know, your writer has an extensive history of writing about "soccer in general and the Los Angeles Galaxy in particular." My most recent stop had been www.hitchhikersguide.us. Unfortunately, for the last two weeks, my usual method of turning columns (e-mailing them to my editor, who would then post them) has not worked as I have gotten back e-mailer daemons indicating "delivery failure." And he has continued to post work, so I can only assume he no longer desires that my work appear on the site. Therefore, unless I hear otherwise, I will be posting my columns to this blog.

Saturday, May 21, 2005

The new dirty nine letter word: Evolution

"Give 'em an inch and they take a mile." That is the apt description of the mass looney tune army that is doing their damnest to impose their irrational world view on the rest of us. If you are still in the dark as to what I am refering to, it is the movement to replace the empirical scientific method with such unmitigated horse crap as "intelligent design." Not this struggle is anything new: it began in Western civilization when such figures as Plato & Aristotle argued for observation of the natural world as it is. There were powerful figures back then that prefered the explanations provided by the religion of the time, and they forced Plato to drink hemlock. Another prime example was Galileo's travails when he "dared" to publish scientific proof over official superstition. Not that the powers-that-be necessarily believed what they were pushing, but their hold on temporal power depended their being seen as the "holders of the truth." Flash forward to present day and all across the USA, the minions of fundamentalist Christianity are trying to bully their hogwash upon the public body politic. To let them do so would constitute a great leap backwards at a critical time in the history of human life on the planet Earth. They just can not accept that the empirical case for Darwin's theory grows every year, while the case for their Biblical version grows weaker to the point where the case for extra-terrestial life visiting this planet is stronger. It is well past time that they put aside their childish notions, just as the majority of the first world no longer believes in polythesism.